SOME MISCELLANEOUS CLASS NOTES
Critical criminology, conflict theory perspective
Conflict theory: the view that the fundamental causes of crime are the social and economic forces operating within society, the criminal justice system and criminal law are thought to be operating on behalf of rich and powerful social elites, with resulting policies aimed at controlling the people who are poor. The criminal justice establishment aims at imposing standards of morality and good behaviour created by the owning class on the whole of society. Focus is on separating the powerful from the 'have nots' who would may 'steal' from others. In the process, the legal rights of people who are poor are often ignored. The middle class, not a social class but rather a socio-economic status, are also co-opted; they side with the elites rather the poor, thinking they might themselves rise to the top by supporting the status quo. | |
Critical criminology: a marxist approach to deviancy and crime |
Some definitions
Beliefs: a set of ideas in which one believes, focus on the individual and his beliefs of how the world/society works, including values | |
Values: what we consider right and wrong, norms: standards of accepted behaviour | |
Conformity: to follow the norms and deviancy: to deviate from the norms | |
Ideology: a belief system and a belief system is a set of shared ideas about the meaning of life | |
Ideological hegemony: control over the production of values and norms and cultural symbols by those in power | |
Social control, sanctions (both positive - benefits and negative - punishment forms) formal (codified rules, regulations) and informal (norms, | |
Social economic status groups: upper class, upper middle class, lower middle class, working class, lower class | |
Social class groups: owning class (bourgeoisie, capitalist class), (ruling class), working class (proletariat, labour), petite bourgeoisie, lumpenproletariat | |
Class awareness: recognizing differences in income, occupational prestige, and lifestyle and accurately locating oneself with social classes | |
Class consciousness: when class awareness becomes a central organizing point of self-definition and political action |
Stereotypes: Generalizing a characteristic from one individual to all others from that group; activists/protestors are often stereotypes based on habits of speech, dress, political views, stereotypical labels used to refer to activists: professional activists, student demonstrators, political extremists, troublemakers, radicals Who is subject to surveillance? Arabs, union/labour, gays and lesbians, students, women, Quebec separatists, Aboriginal Canadians, communists, environmentalists, terrorists, writers, journalists, lawyers; historically: anarchists, socialists, terrorists, labour, immigrants.
|
POLITICAL/GOVERNMENTAL ISSUES
3 types of power: 1) legislative power; 2) executive power; 3) judicial power | |||||||||
3 limits of state power: federal and provincial divisions, state and individual/community divisions, status of Aboriginal Canadians | |||||||||
Constitutional documents:
| |||||||||
Role of Solicitor general – minister responsible for RCMP, senior law officer of the crown, serve the law, protect police from improper political pressures, attorney general – minister responsible for Ministry of Justice, senior law officer of the crown, commissioner of RCMP | |||||||||
Written and unwritten constitution, latter based on tradition of Westminster parliamentary system, constitutional conventions or principles, e.g. rule of law and democracy | |||||||||
Informal and formal public accountability: free press, courts, public inquiry process, parliament and political control | |||||||||
Responsible government in theory is when parliament acts on behalf of citizens of nation not as servants of executive branch, in practice now modern executive gov’t where prime minister is in control. | |||||||||
Civil law and common law: Common law is a body of rulings made by judges on the basis of community customs and previous court decisions. It forms an essential part of the legal system of many English-speaking countries, including the United States and Canada. Early in England's history, judges decided cases according to the way they interpreted the beliefs and unwritten laws of the community. If another judge had ruled in an earlier, similar case, that judge's decision was often used as a precedent (guide). After many judges decided the same question in a similar way, the ruling became law. Common law is often contrasted with civil law, a body of rules passed by a legislature. Under civil law, a judge decides a case by following written rules, rather than previous court decisions | |||||||||
Rule of law (unwritten constitutional principle): individuals be protected from arbitrary power & all persons are equally subject to the law - one law for all |
POLICE ISSUES
Canadian secret service 1864 whose ideology was nativist, anti-semitic and anti-communist | |
Dominion Police worked with British secret service | |
Royal North-West Mounted Police (RNWMP) merged with Dominion Police to create RCMP in 1919/20, mandate was to domestic intelligence and security work until creation of CSIS Canadian Security and Intelligence Service in 1984 | |
RCMP obsessed with communism: concerned more about threat to capitalism then to threat to liberal democracy | |
Types of documentation: personal history files, subject files, publications files, RCMP personnel files, RCMP security bulletins | |
Spymasters were anglo-Canadian, Central Canadian born, military elite, Loyalist ancestry, middle class stock, Royal military college graduates, military experience; some British immigrants with public school backgrounds, imported militarism and associated masculinity, paramilitary structure | |
Rank and file and spies were of foreign background with foreign language skills, changed names, red coats were crème de la crème of secret agents, target was immigrant workers | |
Police state: when the police take over the government and when the government takes over the police | |
Nature of police: conservative, patriarchical, militaristic, common law roots: maintain order, prevent crime and detect and apprehend criminals | |
Focus of Police: the marginalized | |
Accountability of police: courts, internal disciplinary proceedings, citizen complaint procedures, RCMP Public Complaints Commission (PCC) created in 1986 weakened legislation due to police lobbying (Qs re: legal counsel of commission, funding for legal counsel for both sides, who appoints panel | |
Normal repression: activity that is carried out under existing laws and prevailing procedures | |
Abnormal repression: a sharp escalation from the previously established normal repression characterized by new laws, new procedures, innovations in the application of existing laws, new level of repression is deliberate and institutionalized where in normal repression occasional excesses are not, normally introduced as an emergency response to a particular crisis of the state |
Types of surveillance and policing
State: e.g. RCMP, CSIS: legally and legitimately sanctioned use of violence, secure social control through the threat and deployment of coercive force, administrations often participates in moral reform efforts by providing the legal framework for voluntary action and supporting private campaigns through funding and information | |
Private security/corporate police: attempt to prevent crime through the knowledge that one is being monitored, e.g. video cameras in malls | |
Philanthropic institutions (non-state organizations, voluntary organizations, non-profit sector, private charity sector): control is more concerned with minimizing social risk by regulating and reforming behaviour, moral police/regulation, much less confined by legal boundaries and limits of privacy, preserves public order and national security, reform beliefs | |
Result is mixed social economy: how public sector is linked to private forms of social reform and control, and how private policing and surveillance participate in securing social/public order |
RIGHTS
Human and social rights: freedom of speech, assembly, freedom from arbitrary arrest, etc… | |
Political rights: vote, run for office, contact elected representatives, etc... | |
Economic rights: right to employment, freedom from want | |
UN conventions | |
Canadian’s complacency, apathy with regard to these rights |
Bill C 35 An Act to Amend the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act, Dec. 2001:
principle is taken from the United Nations Convention granting diplomatic immunity to politicians attending UN conferences | |
expands defns of internationally protected persons and international organizations, | |
grants enhanced powers to RCMP for security of international conferences | |
Expands the UN definition to include foreign state representatives attending meetings of any kind |
Canada's equivalent to the U.S. Patriot Act, institute after Sept. 11th, 2001
Bill C 36 violates the following principles:
Everyone will be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law. | |
Any person arrested or detained on a criminal charge will have the right to be brought promptly before the judge or other officer authorized by law to decide the lawfulness of the arrest or detention. | |
Everyone will be entitled to a fair and public trial. | |
All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. | |
The government and the public authorities have a duty to comply with the constitution and to act in a manner consistent with law. | |
Human rights and fundamental freedoms will be guaranteed by law. | |
Everyone will have an effective means of redress against administrative decisions. | |
Judges will be independent, and the public judiciary will operate impartially. | |
The independence of the legal profession will be protected. | |
Everyone will have the right to defend himself or herself in court in person or through prompt legal assistance, which will be given free if the person does not have sufficient means to pay for it. | |
Domestic legislation will comply with international laws relating to human rights, including guarantees for the freedom of information and communication, travel, thought, conscience and religion, right of peaceful assembly, and demonstrations, associations, private property, etc |
Bill C 36 allows for the following:
provides RCMP with powers to make investigatory and preventive detentions, e.g. 72 hour detention – detention without charge: can be arrested without cause or need for a probable cause | |
investigative hearings: nothing to protect from self-incrimination | |
secret trials before the trial court; | |
section 27 defn of what is "a prejudicial act to the safety of interest of the state": various economic crimes could relate back to defn of terrorism, e.g. boycotts for environmental or ethical reasons, legal strike against financial markets, work stoppages – in essence socio-economic and political offences; | |
makes it easier for agencies to use electronic surveillance | |
creates new offences targeting unlawful disclosure of certain information of national interest | |
amends the Evidence Act to guard certain information from disclosure in courts | |
reasonable grounds to suspect rather than reasonable grounds to believe | |
Summarized police allegations replace evidence/proof | |
Concept of evidence/proof removed | |
Accusation equals guilt |
Sources: see government of Canada dept. of Justice websites and civil liberties associations, e.g. Canadian Civil Liberty Association, provincial civil liberty organizations
CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE
Civil disobedience: a group's refusal to obey a law because they believe the law is immoral (as in protest against discrimination); refusal to obey a law or follow a policy believed to be unjust.
Practitioners of civil disobediance basing their actions on moral right and usually employ the nonviolent technique of passive resistance in order to bring wider attention to the injustice. Risking punishment, such as violent retaliatory acts or imprisonment, they attempt to bring about changes in the law. In the modern era, civil disobedience has been used in such events as street demonstrations, marches, the occupying of buildings, and strikes and other forms of economic resistance.
The philosophy behind civil disobedience goes back to classical and biblical sources. Perhaps its most influential exposition can be found in Henry David Thoreau's On the Duty of Civil Disobedience (1849), in which he claims that the individual, who grants the state its power in the first place, must follow the dictates of conscience in opposing unjust laws. Thoreau's work had an enormous impact on Mohandas Gandhi and the techniques that he employed first to gain Indian rights in South Africa and later to win independence for India. Gandhi developed the notion of satyagraha [Sanskrit: holding to truth], acts of civil disobedience marked by Indian tradition and his own high moral standards and sense of self-discipline. Attracting a huge number of followers from the Indian public, Gandhi was able to use the technique as an effective political tool and play a key role in bringing about the British decision to end colonial rule of his homeland. His was one of the few relatively unqualified successes in the history of civil disobedience.
The philosophy and tactics of civil disobedience have been used by Quakers and other religious groups, the British labor movement, suffragists, feminists, adherents of prohibition, pacifists and other war resisters (see
conscientious objector), supporters of the disabled, and a wide variety of other dissenters. In the United States, the most outstanding theoretician and practitioner of civil disobedience was civil-rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. During the 1950s and 60s he achieved international fame by leading numerous peaceful marches, boycotts, and sit-ins. Like Gandhi, he was jailed several times. The beatings, mass arrests, and even killings of civil-rights demonstrators pledged to nonviolent civil disobedience were important factors in swaying public opinion and in the ultimate passage of new civil-rights legislation (see integration). Civil disobedience in the United States traditionally has been associated with those on the left of the political spectrum, as were most participants in the anti–Vietnam War movement, but toward the end of the 20th cent. the strategy also began to be employed by those on the right, for example, by those involved in confrontational but nonviolent antiabortion activities.See G. Woodcock, Civil Disobedience (1966); C. Bay and C. C. Walker, Civil Disobedience: Theory and Practice (1973, repr. 1999); D. R. Weber, ed., Civil Disobedience in America: A Documentary History (1978); J. De Nardo, Power in Numbers (1985); P. Harris, ed., Civil Disobedience (1989); H. A. Bedau, ed. Civil Disobedience in Focus (1991); P. Herngren, Paths of Resistance: the Practice of Civil Disobedience (1993); M. Randle, Civil Disobedience (1994); S. L. Carter, The Dissent of the Governed (1998); R. Bleiker, Popular Dissent, Human Agency, and Global Politics (2000). http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/society/A0909663.html
Passive resistance/nonviolent resistance: peaceful resistance to a government by fasting or refusing to cooperate; passive resistance a method of nonviolent protest against laws or policies in order to force a change or secure concessions; it is also known as nonviolent resistance and is the main tactic of
civil disobedience. Passive resistance typically involves such activities as mass demonstrations, refusal to obey or carry out a law or to pay taxes, the occupation of buildings or the blockade of roads, labor strikes, economic boycotts, and similar activities.Possibly originating with the Quakers, it was adopted by Africans, Indians, and U.S. civil-rights and anti–Vietnam War protesters. Among its most articulate advocates have been Gandhi, who maintained that action needs to be accompanied by love and a willingness to search for the truth, and Martin Luther King, Jr., who called for "tough-mindedness and tenderheartedness." Two of the most massive examples of passive resistance were the Solidarity movement in Poland (1980–81) and the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia (1989). Opponents of passive resistance as a means of forcing a change in policy have criticized it for potentially fostering a general disrespect for law that could result in anarchy.
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0837805.html
Pacifism: the doctrine that all violence in unjustifiable; the belief that all international disputes can be settled by arbitration; opposition to war or violence of any kind; refusal to engage in military activity because of one's principles or beliefs; the principle or policy that all differences among nations should be adjusted without recourse to war.; advocacy of opposition to war through individual or collective action against militarism. http://www.infoplease.com/ipd/A0574984.html
Direct Action By Martin Kelley: 'Direct Action' is a term which is often misunderstood. It has the cachet of dramatic zealotry, yet in essence, it is often quieter and more powerful than this stereotype. To act directly is to address the actual issue of your concern. If you're working against hunger, it's might be simply giving someone a meal. If you're working against homelessness, it might be taking over an abandoned house and making it livable. If you want to stop military spending, it might be refusing to pay your income taxes. Direct action differs from symbolic protest action, which is lobbying someone in authority to change their policies. An advantage to direct action is that it doesn't require the cooperation of the authority to be effective. If they intervene to stop your action, you have a dramatic story; if they ignore you, you've followed your conscience and can continue following it further. Since the action in itself has a direct effect, it has a power and strength. In practice, the most effective actions are both direct and symbolic, providing a clear witness to your beliefs. Direct action is only one form of engaging in social change. Civil disobedience tends more often to be symbolic and conscience-led.
Cycle of resistance thesis
Repression as cost thesis: the view that repression has strong negative consequences for the movement, that the rational response to repression is to avoid those costs by withdrawing from active involvement
Repression as resource thesis: the view that activists who participate in mobilizations during periods when both activism and repression are intense are more, not less, likely to escalate their commitment and are more, not less, likely to reamin connected to the movement longer.
Trotskyism - see http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/faq/faq-eng.htm#trotskyism
Why are students considered a threat?
More time – less now compared to a few decades ago? | |
Flexible schedules | |
Access to resources: information in libraries, computers/internet, professors | |
Access to on campus events, usually free | |
Availability of organizing, many student clubs to join | |
Universities are public spaces | |
Less responsibilities | |
Less or no dependents | |
Large numbers, majority at schools | |
Practically/logistically easier to dialogue with others, to organize, to interact with different people, e.g. "radicals" | |
Ideologically/politically often middle class thus more "liberal" (small "l" liberal) | |
Developing cognitive abilities, critical thinking skills | |
Learning new knowledge and information, learning the ways of the world | |
Formulating opinions, not yet set in ways/beliefs | |
Idealistic, not jaded by failure, still able/willing to take more risks, often think can still change the world | |
Independent | |
Maleable minds | |
Authority figures have less impact, e.g. family | |
Live away from influences of home |
Experimental stage of life | |
With knowledge and critical thought you question all that is around you |
Why are women considered a threat?
Cold war culture family was an ideologically contested site, cold war discourse reframed women’s call for peace, justice and equality for working people as a threat to the patriotic normative culture of the masculine elite | |
Ideas was of the patriotic virtues of a stable family life, full-time motherhood and homemaking were foundation of a healthy society, the normative model, powerful cultural symbol of stability, security and democracy, stay at home mother was best protection against juvenile delinquency, homosexuality and divorce – everyone playing out their prescribed gender, sexuality and social functions (FUNCTIONALISM), embrace domesticity in service of the nation – cult of domesticity | |
Women’s position in the home is central to the political stability of capitalism | |
After WWII women were forced to return to the home and become housewives, jobs were for veterans | |
Sexism assumptions: women and children were gullible and susceptible to communist influence and thus family was site for battle against communism, women were stooges for communist movement | |
Loyalty to family and to unions: contradiction and competition between mores of cold war values | |
Ladies auxiliaries were subversively inclined, they represented working families |
Why are gays & lesbians considered a threat?
Gay was seen as a threat, a security risk since went against traditional roles of men and women, gender practices were central to construction of Canadian nat’l security state, masculinity in women and femininity in men were threats to gender and national social order | |
Gays and lesbians were considered subversives, promiscuous, crossing and defying gender and class boundaries, and moral failings/character weakness thus susceptible to communism and thus against bourgeoisie |
If you want peace, prepare for war
Derivation? James Russell Lowell poem, ancient chinese proverb Mao’s political power grows out of the barrel of a gun?
Definition: The original Latin of the expression "if you want peace prepare for war" comes from "Epitoma Rei Militaris," by Vegetius. The Latin is: "Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum."
Also Known As: Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Over
and over again, readers of the Ancient / Classical History site ask:
Did Julius Caesar really say this?
"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword.
It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind is closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar." -- Julius Caesar
The Urban Legends Guide, who has also received many requests for confirmation about this particular quote, says that Barbra Streisand attributed the words to William Shakespeare, presumably in his "Julius Caesar."
KL47, a regular on the Ancient / Classical History forum, provides an excellent explanation of the problems with attributing this passage to Gaius Julius Caesar.
I've no idea where the quote originates from, but it contains several elements which virtually guarantee a non-Roman origin. Apart from anything else, the whole sentiment of the piece is completely anachronistic: phrases like "emboldens the blood", "patriotic fervor", and the offering up of "rights" do not sound like concepts a Roman writer would have come up with. There are also two glaring technical anachronisms for something supposedly written in the 1st century B.C.:
1) The Roman army didn't use drums and they had no military associations for the average Roman, so the phrase "bangs the drums of war" would have been virtually meaningless as a figure of speech.
2) The phrase "double-edged sword" would have been redundant in Caesar's time, as all Roman swords had two edges anyway. [The references to "twice-sharpened" swords in the New Testament actually refer to blades whose edges have been ground on both sides to make them sharper (hence the emphasis on their sharpness), but this is frequently (and willfully) misinterpreted to mean that a double-edged weapon was somehow exceptional.]
A quick check of the net indicates that the quote has only obtained currency since the 9/11 incident, suggesting that it originated recently with someone who expects the black helicopters to land in their yard at any moment.... If it came from a recognized author or playwright of literary significance, someone would have identified them by now. If it isn't an outright fraud, I suppose it's possible that the original writer meant the "I am Caesar" bit to be symbolic, but someone else thought that Caius Julius Caesar had actually written the piece himself and added the attribution.
It is conceivable that a modern translator read a passage attributed to Caesar and used a good deal of license to make it relevant for the twenty-first century, but by now someone would probably have come up with the irresponsibly translated original passage. So, to avoid any further confusion, the answer to the question, "Did Caesar say it?" is -- to the best of our knowledge -- "No."
http://ancienthistory.about.com/cs/caesarjulius/f/didcaesarsayit.htm
Return to MAIN PAGE |