horizontal rule

TRADITIONAL SOCIOLOGICAL PARADIGMS

(aka theories or perspectives)

horizontal rule

 

  1. Functionalism (also known as Structural Functionalism, or Order theories) – Macrosociological level theory

bullet

Focus on order and stability in society

bullet

Society is a system of interrelated, interdependent parts, e.g. social institutions or structures, population groups, organizations, etc..., e.g. a part may be family, education, economic, religion, women, men, the government, etc…

bullet

The function of a part is its contribution to the system, and its effects on other parts, all contributing to the stability of the social system

bullet

The needs of society are to be identified and determining how the parts satisfy the needs

bullet

Each part functions to maintain an orderly and predictable system, preserving social order

bullet

There is a normative consensus where members of society share a set of values and norms

bullet

An analogy is the human body

bullet

Key sociologists: Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons, Robert Merton

Criticisms

bullet

May justify and legitimize the existence of a part of society, e.g. poverty or unemployment

bullet

Helps to preserve status quo by overlooking or downplaying sources of tension and inequality

bullet

Efficiency of a part may not be questioned

bullet

Origins of social conflict and instability not accountable or are considered dysfunctional

 

2.  Conflict Theory (also known as Critical perspectives) – macrosociological level theory

bullet

Focus on conflict as inevitable part of social life,

bullet

Societies are characterized by inequality and thus there is an emphasis on the role of competition in producing conflict

bullet

Conflict is not necessarily a negative aspect of society since it produces social change

bullet

Society comprised of dominant and subordinate groups which compete for resources – the have and the have nots

bullet

Who benefits at whose expense is the question

bullet

Key sociologists: Karl Marx, Max Weber

bullet

Marxism is essentially a sub-theory of conflict theory but it was the originator of conflict theory as well: focus was on class conflict, believing that the economic system was the primary determinant of a society, and within the economic system there existed two classes - the bourgeoisie(owning or ruling class) and the proletariat (working class); class membership was determined by relationship to means of production; belief that the proletariat would organize and precipitate a revolution because of this inequality and thus capitalism would be transformed into socialism and eventually communism.

 

Criticisms

bullet

overemphasize tensions and divisions

bullet

relationship between groups more complex

bullet

situations exist where subordinate groups control the interactions are ignored

 

3.  Interpretivism (also known as symbolic interactionism or interactionism) – microsociological level theory

bullet

Focus is on how people themselves define reality, how they make sense of the world, how they experience and define what people are doing

bullet

Assumption is that social structures are created through interactions among people so that patterns and standards of behaviour emerge, i.e. social reality is a construction by people

bullet

Focus on meanings assigned to actions and symbols, how meanings are learned and modified

bullet

Inquires into factors that influence how we interpret what we say and do, and patterns that give rise to same interpretation for many

bullet

Actors in a play in an analogy – dramaturgy, a sub-theory of interactionism

bullet

Key sociologists: George Herbert Mead and Herbert Blumer

 

Criticisms

bullet

No systematic frameworks for prediction or persistence/evolving of meanings

bullet

Potential for subjectivity in analysis greater

 

SOURCES:  various introductory sociology textbooks authored by the following:  J. Ferrante, B. Hess, R. Schaefer, J.  Mancionis; and other sociologists including N. Blaikie, G. Schutz, K. Marx, T. Parsons.  

horizontal rule

 COMPARING MAJOR THEORETICAL APPROACHES

 

 

(STRUCTURAL)-FUNCTIONALISM

 

CONFLICT THEORY

INTERACTIONISM

aka Interpretivism

View of society

Stable, well-integrated

Characterized by tension & struggle between groups

Active in influencing and affecting everyday social interaction

Level of analysis emphasized

Macrosociological analysis of large scale patterns

Macrosociological analysis of large scale patterns

Microsociological analysis as a way of understanding the larger social phenomena

View of the individual

People are socialized to perform societal functions

People are shaped by power, coercion and authority

People manipulate symbols and create their social worlds through interaction

View of social order

Maintained through cooperation and consensus

Maintained through force and coercion

Maintained by shared understanding of everyday behaviour

View of social change

Predictable, reinforcing

Change takes place all the time and may have positive consequences

Reflected in people’s positions and their communications with others

Key concepts

Stability

Manifest functions

Latent functions

Dysfunctions

Competing interests

Social inequality

Subjugation of groups

Symbols

Small groups

Nonverbal communication

Proponents

Emile Durkheim

Talcott Parsons

Robert Merton

Karl Marx

W.E.B. Du Bois

C. Wright Mills

George Herbert Mead

Charles Horton Cooley

Erving Goffman

Alfred Schutz

 

Source:  McGraw-Hill Companies 1998

horizontal rule

bullet

Introduction to Sociology course documents

bullet

Return to MAINPAGE

 

Revised: September 02, 2010 .